Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30W
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus 9000 versus Ricoh WG-30W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 9000 was released 6 years before the WG-30W and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the 9000 matches up against the WG-30W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Ricoh WG-30W. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Ricoh WG-30W
9000 | WG-30W |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus 9000
WG-30W | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2014 | May 2009 | More recent by 65 months |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Ricoh WG-30W
9000 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display sizing | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30W has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 versus Ricoh WG-30W in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 vs the WG-30W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and WG-30W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements just by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and WG-30W.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-30W to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Ricoh WG-30W |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $300 | $280 |