Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 9000 was released 6 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the 9000 grades vs the WG-5 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| 9000 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus 9000
| WG-5 GPS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 69 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| 9000 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 enjoys external dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the 9000 and the WG-5 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and WG-5 GPS.
Clearly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to give greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 9000 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Alternate name | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 236 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $500 |