Olympus 9000 vs Samsung DV150F
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 9000 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus 9000 and Samsung DV150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and DV150F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was released 4 years prior to the DV150F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the 9000 matches up versus the DV150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 9000 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Samsung DV150F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung DV150F
| 9000 | DV150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus 9000
| DV150F | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 44 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung DV150F
| 9000 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 provides exterior dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung DV150F has dimensions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 9000 and Samsung DV150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 against the DV150F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and DV150F is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The graphic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and DV150F.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung DV150F to result in more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older 9000 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung DV150F |
| Also called | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $150 |
