Olympus 9000 vs Samsung EX2F
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 9000 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung EX2F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is fairly comparable but the 9000 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 9000 was launched 4 years before the EX2F and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the 9000 matches up against the EX2F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 9000 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Samsung EX2F. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung EX2F
| 9000 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus 9000
| EX2F | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 43 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung EX2F
| 9000 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has specifications of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the 9000 vs the EX2F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and EX2F is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and EX2F.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical MP but different sensor measurements. The 9000 uses the smaller sensor which should make getting bokeh more difficult. The older 9000 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung EX2F |
| Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 294g (0.65 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $478 |