Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Samsung HZ25W front
Portability
70
Imaging
35
Features
32
Overall
33

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Also Known as mju 9000
Samsung HZ25W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
  • Introduced July 2010
  • Also Known as WB5000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung HZ25W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 9000 was manufactured 13 months before the HZ25W which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 9000 scores against the HZ25W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung HZ25W

 9000 HZ25W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus 9000

 HZ25W 9000 
IntroducedJuly 2010May 2009Fresher by 13 months
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung HZ25W

 9000 HZ25W 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).

Examine the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the 9000 compared to the HZ25W.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and HZ25W is 92 and 70 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specs. The visual underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and HZ25W.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same exact MP so you should expect comparable quality of files however you will need to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography advice
Samsung HZ25W Portrait photography advice
21
no manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
34
manual focus
saves RAW formats
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography information
Samsung HZ25W Street photography information
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
55
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography highlights
Samsung HZ25W Sports photography highlights
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
34
excellent zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography details
Samsung HZ25W Travel photography details
58
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
long zoom (280mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
52
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
great reach (624mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography advice
Samsung HZ25W Landscape photography advice
32
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Timelapse mode
43
manual focus
reasonably wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 9000
Vlogging with Samsung HZ25W
27
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
no microphone support
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
24
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic port
Photography Glossary

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Samsung HZ25W
 Olympus Stylus 9000Samsung HZ25W
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Samsung HZ25W
Alternative name mju 9000 WB5000
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-05-14 2010-07-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 50 64
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 26-624mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 5.60 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225g (0.50 lbs) 428g (0.94 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $300 $350