Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 9000
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB650
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Here, we are looking at the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The 9000 was unveiled 13 months before the HZ35W making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before diving into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the 9000 scores vs the HZ35W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung HZ35W

 9000 HZ35W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus 9000

 HZ35W 9000 
AnnouncedJune 2010May 2009Fresher by 13 months
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kSharper display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung HZ35W

 9000 HZ35W 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Examine the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 against the HZ35W.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and HZ35W.

To sum up, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of pictures although you should really consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography information
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography information
21
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
34
you can focus manually
has face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography info
Samsung HZ35W Street photography info
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than competition (225g)
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography details
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography details
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
42
amazing zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking focus
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography information
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography information
58
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long zoom (280mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (225g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
63
lighter than competitors in class (245g)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (360mm)
no Time Lapse function
low resolution (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 9000
Landscape photography with Samsung HZ35W
32
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
43
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging features
Samsung HZ35W Vlogging features
27
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external mic support
heavier than competition (225g)
31
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not contain selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus Stylus 9000Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Samsung HZ35W
Also called mju 9000 WB650
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-05-14 2010-06-16
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing range 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 16 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 gr (0.50 lb) 245 gr (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $300 $300