Olympus 9000 vs Samsung MV800
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Introduced September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 9000 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus 9000 and Samsung MV800, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 9000 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the MV800 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the 9000 scores versus the MV800 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus 9000 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Samsung MV800. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung MV800
| 9000 | MV800 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus 9000
| MV800 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 28 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung MV800
| 9000 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has sizing of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Olympus 9000 and Samsung MV800 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 against the MV800.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and MV800 is 92 and 97 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The picture here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and MV800.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung MV800 to result in more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung MV800 |
| Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 121g (0.27 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Micro SD |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $300 | $499 |