Olympus 9000 vs Samsung NX300
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Replaced the Samsung NX210
- Newer Model is Samsung NX500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 9000 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung NX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was manufactured 5 years before the NX300 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the 9000 grades versus the NX300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 9000 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Samsung NX300. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung NX300
| 9000 | NX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus 9000
| NX300 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 | May 2009 | Newer by 55 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3.3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 768k | 230k | Crisper display (+538k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung NX300
| 9000 | NX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has got external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung NX300 has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung NX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 vs the NX300.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and NX300 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and NX300.
As you can see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung NX300 will produce extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung NX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung NX300 |
| Alternate name | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2013-11-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3.3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 768k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lb) | 331 grams (0.73 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 76 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $750 |