Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally Known as WB2000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 9000 was brought out 9 months earlier than the TL350 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the 9000 matches up versus the TL350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung TL350
| 9000 | TL350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Olympus 9000
| TL350 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 9 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung TL350
| 9000 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 provides physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the 9000 vs the TL350.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and TL350 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The graphic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and TL350.
Plainly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus 9000 to deliver extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung TL350 |
| Other name | mju 9000 | WB2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $400 |
