Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is pretty well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 9000 was announced 3 years before the WB150F and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the 9000 scores vs the WB150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Samsung WB150F. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung WB150F
| 9000 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Olympus 9000
| WB150F | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 | May 2009 | More recent by 32 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB150F
| 9000 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 enjoys outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 and the WB150F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and WB150F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and WB150F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should expect the Samsung WB150F to give you extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB150F |
| Also referred to as | mju 9000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 188 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $230 |