Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Released July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was announced 3 years before the WB210 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the 9000 matches up against the WB210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung WB210
| 9000 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Clearer screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Olympus 9000
| WB210 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB210
| 9000 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 features external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the 9000 vs the WB210.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and WB210 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and WB210.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung WB210 to result in more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB210 |
| Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lb) | 174 gr (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $279 |