Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB250F
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28


93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung WB250F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The 9000 was unveiled 4 years before the WB250F which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the 9000 scores vs the WB250F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Samsung WB250F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung WB250F
9000 | WB250F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus 9000
WB250F | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 44 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB250F
9000 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Samsung WB250F has proportions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung WB250F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 against the WB250F.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and WB250F is 92 and 93 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and WB250F.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung WB250F to result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB250F |
Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $300 | $250 |