Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 9000 was introduced 5 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the 9000 grades against the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung WB35F
9000 | WB35F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus 9000
WB35F | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | May 2009 | More modern by 56 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB35F
9000 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB35F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the 9000 versus the WB35F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and WB35F.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB35F to give more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB35F |
Alternate name | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $300 | $130 |