Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The 9000 was introduced 5 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the 9000 grades against the WB35F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung WB35F

 9000 WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus 9000

 WB35F 9000 
IntroducedJanuary 2014May 2009More modern by 56 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB35F

 9000 WB35F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB35F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the 9000 versus the WB35F.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and WB35F is 92 and 93 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and WB35F.

As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB35F to give more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography advice
21
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
37
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography information
Samsung WB35F Street photography information
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (194 grams)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography info
Samsung WB35F Sports photography info
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
58
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
70
lighter than others in class (194g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (288mm)
no Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 9000
Landscape photography with Samsung WB35F
32
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse mode
43
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
no Time Lapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB35F Vlogging advice
27
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone support
more heavy than others in class (225 grams)
31
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (194g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB35F
 Olympus Stylus 9000Samsung WB35F
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Samsung WB35F
Alternate name mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-05-14 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 gr (0.50 lbs) 194 gr (0.43 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP70A
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $300 $130