Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 9000 was announced 4 years earlier than the WB800F which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the 9000 scores against the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Samsung WB800F
| 9000 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus 9000
| WB800F | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 44 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Samsung WB800F
| 9000 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 features external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 9000 versus Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the 9000 and the WB800F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and WB800F.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to offer extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 9000 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $300 | $300 |