Olympus 9000 vs Sigma SD10
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus 9000 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released March 2004
- Replaced the Sigma SD9
- Refreshed by Sigma SD14
Photography Glossary Olympus 9000 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus 9000 versus Sigma SD10, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sigma. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 9000 was manufactured 5 years after the SD10 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the 9000 scores against the SD10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 9000 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sigma SD10
| 9000 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2009 | March 2004 | Newer by 63 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 130k | Crisper display (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus 9000
| SD10 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sigma SD10
| 9000 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has physical measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sigma SD10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the 9000 vs the SD10.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and SD10 is 92 and 54 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The picture here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and SD10.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus 9000 will render extra detail due to its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern 9000 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 9000 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sigma SD10 |
| Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 130k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $300 | $198 |