Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Launched July 2008
- Replacement is Sony A230
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus 9000 and Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the 9000 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 9000 was launched 11 months after the A200 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the 9000 matches up against the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A200
9000 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2009 | July 2008 | Newer by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus 9000
A200 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A200
9000 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the 9000 and the A200.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and A200.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus 9000 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern 9000 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Alternate name | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lb) | 572 grams (1.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $300 | $100 |