Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
49
Features
38
Overall
44

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Launched July 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A230
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Overview

In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus 9000 and Sony A200, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the 9000 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The 9000 was launched 11 months after the A200 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the 9000 matches up against the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A200

 9000 A200 
LaunchedMay 2009July 2008Newer by 11 months

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus 9000

 A200 9000 
Manual focus More exact focusing

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A200

 9000 A200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony A200 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Compare the Olympus 9000 and Sony A200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the 9000 and the A200.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through specs. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and A200.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus 9000 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern 9000 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography highlights
Sony A200 Portrait photography highlights
21
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
53
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Sony A200 as a Street photography camera
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than average in class (225 grams)
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography advice
Sony A200 Sports photography advice
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus 9000
Travel photography with Sony A200
58
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than average in class (225g)
resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.2)
46
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A200 Landscape photography highlights
32
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
53
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 9000
Vlogging with Sony A200
27
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (225g)
9
can't record video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony A200
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Alternate name mju 9000 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2009-05-14 2008-07-17
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 50 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 grams (0.50 lb) 572 grams (1.26 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 521
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal Compact Flash
Storage slots One One
Retail price $300 $100