Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
50
Features
40
Overall
46

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Also referred to as mju 9000
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Previous Model is Sony A200
  • Successor is Sony A290
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A230, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the A230 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the 9000 (1/2.3") and A230 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The 9000 was announced very close to the A230 which means that they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the 9000 matches up against the A230 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A230

 9000 A230 

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus 9000

 A230 9000 
Focus manually More accurate focus

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A230

 9000 A230 
RevealedMay 2009May 2009Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony A230 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Examine the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A230 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the 9000 vs the A230.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and A230 is 92 and 69 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The picture below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and A230.

As you have seen, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus 9000 will provide extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography information
Sony A230 Portrait photography information
21
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
54
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography highlights
Sony A230 Street photography highlights
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competitors (225g)
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 9000
Sports photography with Sony A230
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
46
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
terrible battery power (230 CIPA)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus 9000
Travel photography with Sony A230
58
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (225g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (230 shots)
low megapixels (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 9000
Landscape photography with Sony A230
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
51
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
no liveview feature
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
terrible battery power (230 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging highlights
Sony A230 Vlogging highlights
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than competitors (225g)
9
no video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony A230
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Alternate name mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2009-05-14 2009-05-18
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 50 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m 10.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225 gr (0.50 pounds) 490 gr (1.08 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 63
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.4
DXO Low light score not tested 531
Other
Battery life - 230 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $300 $569