Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
47
Overall
51

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Sony A290
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Launched June 2010
  • Succeeded the Sony A230
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 Overview

Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A290, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the A290 (14MP) is very close but the 9000 (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The 9000 was manufactured 13 months prior to the A290 making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the 9000 matches up vs the A290 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A290

 9000 A290 

Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus 9000

 A290 9000 
LaunchedJune 2010May 2009More modern by 13 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A290

 9000 A290 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display sizing
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 features external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A290 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 against the A290.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and A290 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The image below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and A290.

All in all, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 9000 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony A290 will render more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
Portrait photography with Sony A290
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
65
manual focus
decent MP (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography factors
Sony A290 Street photography factors
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than average (225g)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography highlights
Sony A290 Sports photography highlights
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
bad battery power (290 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A290 as a Travel photography camera
58
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than average (225 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
53
decent MP (14MP)
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
bad battery power (290 CIPA)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A290 as a Landscape photography camera
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
no Time Lapse function
58
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inch)
doesn't have liveview
bad battery power (290 CIPA)
no Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A290 as a Vlogging camera
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic port
heavier than average (225g)
9
no video recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony A290
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
Otherwise known as mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2009-05-14 2010-06-09
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Available lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 gr (0.50 pounds) 549 gr (1.21 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 66
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 615
Other
Battery life - 290 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $300 $600