Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Additionally referred to as mju 9000
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • New Model is Sony A380
Photography Glossary

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A350, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the A350 (14MP) is very comparable but the 9000 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The 9000 was introduced 12 months later than the A350 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the 9000 grades versus the A350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A350

 9000 A350 
IntroducedMay 2009June 2008More recent by 12 months

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus 9000

 A350 9000 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A350

 9000 A350 
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display sizing
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 features outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony A350 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 and the A350.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and A350 is 92 and 62 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out specs. The graphic underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and A350.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 9000 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony A350 will provide more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent 9000 should have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
Portrait photography with Sony A350
21
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
71
you can focus manually
good resolution (14MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography info
Sony A350 Street photography info
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than average in class (225g)
66
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
heavier than competitors (674 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 9000
Sports photography with Sony A350
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 fps)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography advice
Sony A350 Travel photography advice
58
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (225g)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
51
good resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (674 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography factors
Sony A350 Landscape photography factors
32
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
64
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
small screen (2.7")
does not have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging details
Sony A350 Vlogging details
27
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic support
heavier than average in class (225 grams)
9
no video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony A350
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Also called mju 9000 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2009-05-14 2008-06-06
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 50 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.7" 2.7"
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225g (0.50 lbs) 674g (1.49 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $300 $600