Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28


66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Old Model is Sony A380

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the 9000 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.

The 9000 was unveiled 14 months before the A390 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the 9000 matches up vs the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A390
9000 | A390 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus 9000
A390 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2010 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 14 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A390
9000 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 comes with outside dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the 9000 and the A390.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and A390 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The picture here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and A390.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 9000 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A390 will produce extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 pounds) | 549g (1.21 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $300 | $500 |