Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Released June 2010
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-C3
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the NEX-3 (14MP) is very comparable but the 9000 (1/2.3") and NEX-3 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 9000 was brought out 12 months before the NEX-3 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the 9000 matches up versus the NEX-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony NEX-3
9000 | NEX-3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus 9000
NEX-3 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2010 | May 2009 | Fresher by 12 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony NEX-3
9000 | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 provides physical measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3 has dimensions of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the 9000 versus the NEX-3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and NEX-3 is 92 and 89 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and NEX-3.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 9000 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Sony NEX-3 will produce extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older 9000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
Also called | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-06-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 pounds) | 297g (0.65 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 830 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $0 |