Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c94ff/c94ffb4ff8eb21d03f8fbb46e1fa35095f788790" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5N front Sony Alpha NEX-5N front"
89 Imaging
56 Features
69 Overall
61
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Introduced October 2011
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5
- Updated by Sony NEX-5R
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus 9000 and Sony NEX-5N, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and NEX-5N (16MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and NEX-5N (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The 9000 was brought out 3 years before the NEX-5N which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the 9000 matches up vs the NEX-5N in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Alpha NEX-5N. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony NEX-5N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony NEX-5N
9000 | NEX-5N |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5N over the Olympus 9000
NEX-5N | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 29 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony NEX-5N
9000 | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony NEX-5N has specifications of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 and Sony NEX-5N in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the 9000 and the NEX-5N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a677/3a67734b61bb9585323d21d808107d03e36e2d83" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N size comparison Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and NEX-5N is 92 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3902c/3902c3ea1c6e68c02f922f4b1f1494760661760e" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N top view buttons comparison Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specifications. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and NEX-5N.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 9000 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony NEX-5N will render more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f593f/f593f5be9877a76e5cda68070e578563d54fb35a" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N sensor size comparison Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N sensor size comparison"
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e725/1e725149fd176150efc0477bbca72474b68b84ab" alt="Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 9000 vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha NEX-5N |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2011-10-03 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1079 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 460 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $550 |