Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Lens-style by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The 9000 was released 6 years earlier than the QX1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the 9000 grades vs the QX1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony QX1

 9000 QX1 
Screen dimensions2.7""Bigger screen (+2.7")
Screen resolution230k0kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus 9000

 QX1 9000 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014May 2009Newer by 64 months
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony QX1

 9000 QX1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 enjoys outside measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has proportions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Look at the Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 9000 vs the QX1.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and QX1 is 92 and 90 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The image underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and QX1.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Sony QX1 will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography highlights
Sony QX1 Portrait photography highlights
21
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
66
manual focus
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography information
Sony QX1 Street photography information
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than competition (225g)
69
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
comes with focus by touch
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Sports photography camera
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
56
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
better than average battery (440 shots)
max fps very slow (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography information
Sony QX1 Travel photography information
58
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (225g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
71
better than average battery (440 per charge)
comes with focus by touch
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography factors
Sony QX1 Landscape photography factors
32
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse function
64
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (440 CIPA)
tiny screen ( inch)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging features
Sony QX1 Vlogging features
27
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic socket
heavier than competition (225 grams)
32
touchscreen
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
no microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (216 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony QX1
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Alpha QX1
Otherwise known as mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Lens-style
Released 2009-05-14 2014-09-03
Body design Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 1600 16000
Minimum native ISO 50 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 1.6
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch -
Screen resolution 230k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.00 m 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225g (0.50 lb) 216g (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 shots
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $300 $500