Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Alternative Name is mju 9000
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Released February 2016
  • Succeeded the Sony A6000
  • Successor is Sony A6500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Overview

In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A6300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The 9000 was released 7 years prior to the A6300 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the 9000 matches up versus the A6300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A6300

 9000 A6300 

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus 9000

 A6300 9000 
ReleasedFebruary 2016May 2009More recent by 81 months
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution922k230kSharper display (+692k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A6300

 9000 A6300 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch display Missing Touch display

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 and the A6300.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and A6300 is 92 and 83 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and A6300.

Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 9000 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A6300 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography details
Sony A6300 Portrait photography details
20
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
80
focusing manually
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Street photography camera
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (225 grams)
79
has a tilting screen
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
great high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography advice
Sony A6300 Sports photography advice
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
75
good megapixels (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography details
Sony A6300 Travel photography details
58
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (225 grams)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
76
environment sealing
good megapixels (24MP)
has built in flash
display is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A6300 as a Landscape photography camera
31
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual control
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Timelapse mode
79
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a good size (3")
good megapixels (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging info
Sony A6300 Vlogging info
27
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (225 grams)
35
supports face detect focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
includes mic support
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony A6300
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Alpha a6300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Alpha a6300
Otherwise known as mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2009-05-14 2016-02-03
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Highest boosted ISO - 51200
Min native ISO 50 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 425
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Available lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225g (0.50 lbs) 404g (0.89 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 85
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 24.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.7
DXO Low light rating not tested 1437
Other
Battery life - 400 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $300 $889