Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Released February 2016
- Succeeded the Sony A6000
- Successor is Sony A6500
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A6300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was released 7 years prior to the A6300 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the 9000 matches up versus the A6300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sony Alpha a6300. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A6300
9000 | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus 9000
A6300 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | May 2009 | More recent by 81 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A6300
9000 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 has physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the 9000 and the A6300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and A6300 is 92 and 83 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and A6300.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 9000 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A6300 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 404g (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $300 | $889 |