Olympus 9000 vs Sony H200
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H200 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus 9000 versus Sony H200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and H200 (20MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was released 4 years before the H200 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the 9000 grades against the H200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony H200
9000 | H200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus 9000
H200 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | May 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony H200
9000 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has specifications of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 versus Sony H200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the 9000 against the H200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and H200 is 92 and 67 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and H200.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Sony H200 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 2920 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 20cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 530 gr (1.17 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Battery type | - | AA |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $250 |