Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400 Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and H400 (20MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 9000 was manufactured 5 years before the H400 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the 9000 grades versus the H400 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony H400
9000 | H400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Olympus 9000
H400 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | May 2009 | Fresher by 57 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony H400
9000 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 has outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony H400 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") having a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the 9000 against the H400.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and H400 is 92 and 62 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The graphic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and H400.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Sony H400 to result in more detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony H400 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 8.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lb) | 628 gr (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $300 | $268 |