Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
42 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-400mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 234g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Replacement is Sony HX20V
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and HX10V (18MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 9000 was revealed 3 years prior to the HX10V and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the 9000 grades vs the HX10V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony HX10V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony HX10V
9000 | HX10V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX10V over the Olympus 9000
HX10V | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | May 2009 | Fresher by 34 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX10V
9000 | HX10V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 provides outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony HX10V has dimensions of 105mm x 60mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the 9000 vs the HX10V.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and HX10V is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and HX10V.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Sony HX10V to resolve greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX10V Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V |
Also called | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-400mm (16.7x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) | 234 grams (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $300 | $616 |