Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX99
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released September 2018
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX99 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX99, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) have different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 9000 was introduced 10 years earlier than the HX99 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the 9000 grades vs the HX99 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony HX99
| 9000 | HX99 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Olympus 9000
| HX99 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2018 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 113 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3.00" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX99
| 9000 | HX99 |
|---|
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 enjoys exterior dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony HX99 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 9000 and Sony HX99 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 9000 compared to the HX99.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and HX99 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing technical specs. The pic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and HX99.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 9000 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony HX99 will render extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 9000 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Also called | mju 9000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2018-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.00 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 242g (0.53 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $469 |