Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX100
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
92 Imaging
51 Features
44 Overall
48
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2013
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX100 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus 9000 versus Sony QX100, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Lens-style by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and QX100 (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and QX100 (1") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 9000 was brought out 5 years prior to the QX100 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the 9000 grades vs the QX100 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony QX100
9000 | QX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.7" | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Olympus 9000
QX100 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2013 | May 2009 | More modern by 52 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony QX100
9000 | QX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 provides exterior dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony QX100 has measurements of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony QX100 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the 9000 and the QX100.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and QX100 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and QX100.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 9000 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Sony QX100 will result in extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX100 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
Also called | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2013-09-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 160 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | - |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | None |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $300 | $268 |