Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX30
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Revealed September 2014
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX30 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus 9000 versus Sony QX30, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and QX30 (20MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 9000 was announced 6 years earlier than the QX30 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the 9000 matches up versus the QX30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony QX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony QX30
9000 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Olympus 9000
QX30 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | May 2009 | More modern by 64 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony QX30
9000 | QX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 features external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony QX30 has dimensions of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony QX30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the 9000 against the QX30.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and QX30 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX30 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The pic here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and QX30.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Sony QX30 to offer you extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX30 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 |
Otherwise known as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
Launched | 2009-05-14 | 2014-09-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | - |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | None |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 200 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $300 | $348 |