Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX1
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Other Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched February 2013
Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX1 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus 9000 and Sony RX1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) boast totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 9000 was brought out 4 years earlier than the RX1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the 9000 matches up against the RX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony RX1
9000 | RX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus 9000
RX1 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | May 2009 | More modern by 45 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony RX1
9000 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 9000 comes with exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony RX1 has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 9000 and Sony RX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the 9000 vs the RX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and RX1 is 92 and 79 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and RX1.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 9000 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony RX1 will provide you with extra detail having its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 9000 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Other name | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-02-19 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.0-22.0 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) | 482 grams (1.06 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 93 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $300 | $2,798 |