Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Other Name is mju 9000
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Revealed March 2016
  • Superseded the Sony RX10 II
  • Refreshed by Sony RX10 IV
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus 9000 versus Sony RX10 III, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") come with totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The 9000 was released 7 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the 9000 grades vs the RX10 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony RX10 III

 9000 RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus 9000

 RX10 III 9000 
RevealedMarch 2016May 2009More recent by 83 months
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1229k230kCrisper display (+999k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony RX10 III

 9000 RX10 III 
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 provides physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Examine the Olympus 9000 versus Sony RX10 III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the 9000 compared to the RX10 III.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and RX10 III is 92 and 53 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 9000 and RX10 III.

All in all, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 9000 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony RX10 III will give more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography factors
Sony RX10 III Portrait photography factors
21
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
71
focusing manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
includes face detection focus
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Street photography camera
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
64
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
exports RAW files
weather proofing
more heavy than competition in class (1,051g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Sports photography camera
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
70
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
better than average battery power (420 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography factors
Sony RX10 III Travel photography factors
58
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
long zoom (280mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (225 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
55
better than average battery power (420 CIPA)
weather proofing
good resolution (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (600mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (1,051g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography advice
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography advice
32
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual exposure
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
63
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
exports RAW files
weather proofing
better than average battery power (420 shots)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
lack of Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 9000
Vlogging with Sony RX10 III
27
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (225g)
28
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes external microphone socket
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competition in class (1,051 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Otherwise known as mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-05-14 2016-03-29
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 50 125
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus range 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.9 2.7
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 14.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.00 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225 gr (0.50 lbs) 1051 gr (2.32 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Storage type xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $300 $1,398