Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front
Portability
52
Imaging
53
Features
82
Overall
64

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 9000
Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Launched September 2017
  • Earlier Model is Sony RX10 III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Olympus 9000 and Sony RX10 IV, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The 9000 was brought out 9 years prior to the RX10 IV and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the 9000 matches up vs the RX10 IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony RX10 IV

 9000 RX10 IV 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Olympus 9000

 RX10 IV 9000 
LaunchedSeptember 2017May 2009More recent by 101 months
Manual focus More exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1440k230kSharper screen (+1210k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony RX10 IV

 9000 RX10 IV 
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 has external measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony RX10 IV has proportions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus 9000 and Sony RX10 IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 vs the RX10 IV.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and RX10 IV is 92 and 52 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and RX10 IV.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 9000 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony RX10 IV will provide extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography details
Sony RX10 IV Portrait photography details
21
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
71
focusing manually
high flash sync (1/2,000 seconds)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (1")
includes face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Street photography camera
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competition (225 grams)
64
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
offers focus by touch
environment proofing
more heavy than others in class (1,095 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography info
Sony RX10 IV Sports photography info
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
76
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
max frames per second high (24.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography information
Sony RX10 IV Travel photography information
58
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (225g)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
56
environment proofing
connects via bluetooth
offers focus by touch
MP count good (20MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (600mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (1,095 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.4)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography advice
Sony RX10 IV Landscape photography advice
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
no Timelapse function
62
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.4)
does not have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging info
Sony RX10 IV Vlogging info
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone jack
more heavy than competition (225 grams)
29
quite wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
includes external microphone jack
slow max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
more heavy than others in class (1,095g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus 9000 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony RX10 IV
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
Other name mju 9000 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-05-14 2017-09-12
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 50 125
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 315
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing distance 1cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 2.7
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dot 1,440k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed - 24.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/2000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 gr (0.50 lb) 1095 gr (2.41 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 400 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $300 $1,698