Olympus 9000 vs Sony TX55
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28


97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus 9000 vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Introduced July 2011

Olympus 9000 vs Sony TX55 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus 9000 and Sony TX55, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and TX55 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The 9000 was introduced 3 years prior to the TX55 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the 9000 grades against the TX55 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony TX55 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony TX55
9000 | TX55 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Olympus 9000
TX55 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 26 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3.3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony TX55
9000 | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 comes with external dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony TX55 has specifications of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") with a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 9000 and Sony TX55 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 and the TX55.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and TX55 is 92 and 97 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and TX55.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Sony TX55 to provide more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older 9000 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2011-07-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 109g (0.24 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $300 | $350 |