Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced May 2009
  • Also referred to as mju 9000
Sony W310
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Photography Glossary

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 Overview

The following is a in depth review of the Olympus 9000 and Sony W310, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the W310 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The 9000 was unveiled 7 months prior to the W310 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the 9000 grades versus the W310 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony W310

 9000 W310 

Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Olympus 9000

 W310 9000 
IntroducedJanuary 2010May 2009Newer by 7 months

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony W310

 9000 W310 
Manually focus No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal display size
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 provides physical measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony W310 has proportions of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus 9000 and Sony W310 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the 9000 versus the W310.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and W310 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 9000 and W310.

Clearly, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution and you should expect comparable quality of images although you should really take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged 9000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography information
Sony W310 Portrait photography information
20
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
20
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Street photography camera
Sony W310 as a Street photography camera
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than competitors (225g)
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography highlights
Sony W310 Sports photography highlights
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow fps (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography information
Sony W310 Travel photography information
58
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors (225 grams)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
58
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography info
Sony W310 Landscape photography info
31
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
32
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging information
Sony W310 Vlogging information
27
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic socket
heavier than competitors (225 grams)
29
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony W310
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
Also called as mju 9000 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-05-14 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.0-5.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.00 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225 gr (0.50 lbs) 137 gr (0.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $300 $150