Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Alternative Name is mju 9000
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 Overview

The following is a extensive review of the Olympus 9000 versus Sony W320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the 9000 (12MP) and the W320 (14MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 9000 was brought out 7 months prior to the W320 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the 9000 scores against the W320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony W320

 9000 W320 

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus 9000

 W320 9000 
ReleasedJanuary 2010May 2009Newer by 7 months

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony W320

 9000 W320 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent display measurements
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 comes with exterior measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony W320 has sizing of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check the Olympus 9000 versus Sony W320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the 9000 versus the W320.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and W320 is 92 and 97 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through specifications. The image below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and W320.

To sum up, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony W320 to give greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
Portrait photography with Sony W320
20
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
28
MP count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography details
Sony W320 Street photography details
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than others in class (225 grams)
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W320 as a Sports photography camera
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
MP count good (14MP)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography details
Sony W320 Travel photography details
58
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (225 grams)
resolution not great (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
66
MP count good (14MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography information
Sony W320 Landscape photography information
31
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
33
fairly wide (26mm)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 9000
Vlogging with Sony W320
27
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic support
heavier than others in class (225 grams)
26
fairly wide (26mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus 9000 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony W320
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Also referred to as mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-05-14 2010-01-07
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 50 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance 1cm 4cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225 gr (0.50 pounds) 117 gr (0.26 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $300 $269