Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Announced February 2014
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220 Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WX220 (18MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 9000 was revealed 5 years before the WX220 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the 9000 grades vs the WX220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus 9000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The full galleries are available at Olympus 9000 Gallery & Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony WX220
9000 | WX220 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus 9000
WX220 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | May 2009 | More recent by 57 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony WX220
9000 | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 comes with exterior dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony WX220 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the 9000 versus the WX220.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and WX220 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and WX220.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Sony WX220 to give you greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
Also referred to as | mju 9000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2014-02-12 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lbs) | 121g (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $300 | $198 |