Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Also referred to as mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Newer Model is Sony WX350
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony WX300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WX300 (18MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 9000 was announced 4 years prior to the WX300 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the 9000 matches up vs the WX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony WX300
9000 | WX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Olympus 9000
WX300 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | May 2009 | More recent by 45 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony WX300
9000 | WX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 offers exterior dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony WX300 has proportions of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 9000 versus Sony WX300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the 9000 and the WX300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and WX300 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and WX300.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Sony WX300 to resolve extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
Also called as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-05-14 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-6.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225 gr (0.50 lbs) | 166 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $330 |