Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 front
Portability
94
Imaging
42
Features
38
Overall
40

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced May 2009
  • Also referred to as mju 9000
Sony WX300
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
  • 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
  • Revealed February 2013
  • Newer Model is Sony WX350
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony WX300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WX300 (18MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The 9000 was announced 4 years prior to the WX300 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the 9000 matches up vs the WX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony WX300

 9000 WX300 

Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Olympus 9000

 WX300 9000 
RevealedFebruary 2013May 2009More recent by 45 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony WX300

 9000 WX300 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 9000 offers exterior dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony WX300 has proportions of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus 9000 versus Sony WX300 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the 9000 and the WX300.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 9000 and WX300 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and WX300.

Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Sony WX300 to resolve extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older 9000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 Portrait photography details
Sony WX300 Portrait photography details
21
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
36
megapixel count decent (18 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 9000
Street photography with Sony WX300
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (225 grams)
63
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (166 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
Sony WX300 as a Sports photography camera
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
49
excellent zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (18MP)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus 9000 Travel photography features
Sony WX300 Travel photography features
58
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
very long zoom (280mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (225 grams)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
71
lighter than others in class (166g)
megapixel count decent (18 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
long zoom (500mm)
missing Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 Landscape photography advice
Sony WX300 Landscape photography advice
32
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
44
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (18MP)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 9000
Vlogging with Sony WX300
27
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (225g)
35
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (166 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony WX300
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300
Also called as mju 9000 -
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-05-14 2013-02-20
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 25-500mm (20.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.5-6.5
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.00 m 4.30 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 225 gr (0.50 lbs) 166 gr (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $300 $330