Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX500
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced April 2015
- Earlier Model is Sony WX350
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX500 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus 9000 and Sony WX500, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and WX500 (18MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 9000 was unveiled 7 years prior to the WX500 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the 9000 matches up versus the WX500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony WX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony WX500
9000 | WX500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Olympus 9000
WX500 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | May 2009 | More recent by 72 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony WX500
9000 | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 9000 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) while the Sony WX500 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 9000 and Sony WX500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the 9000 and the WX500.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and WX500 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and WX500.
To sum up, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Sony WX500 to provide more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older 9000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 9000 vs Sony WX500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 |
Also Known as | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2015-04-14 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $300 | $348 |