Clicky

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
63
Features
85
Overall
71

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Additionally Known as mju 9000
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Introduced November 2011
  • Replacement is Sony A68
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A65, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and A65 (24MP) and the 9000 (1/2.3") and A65 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The 9000 was launched 3 years earlier than the A65 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the 9000 matches up versus the A65 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

				

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony A65

 9000 A65 

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus 9000

 A65 9000 
IntroducedNovember 2011May 2009Fresher by 30 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony A65

 9000 A65 
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 9000 offers physical measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) whilst the Sony A65 has sizing of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") along with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus 9000 versus Sony A65 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the 9000 vs the A65.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the 9000 and A65 is 92 and 64 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by researching technical specs. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the 9000 and A65.

As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 9000 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A65 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The older 9000 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A65 as a Portrait photography camera
20
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
77
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus 9000 Street photography advice
Sony A65 Street photography advice
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competition (225 grams)
77
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus 9000 Sports photography factors
Sony A65 Sports photography factors
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
81
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus 9000
Travel photography with Sony A65
58
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
very long reach (280mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (225 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
68
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 9000 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A65 as a Landscape photography camera
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not available
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse recording
75
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 Vlogging factors
Sony A65 Vlogging factors
27
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (225g)
78
selfie friendly screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes external microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 9000 vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 9000 and Sony A65
 Olympus Stylus 9000Sony SLT-A65
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus 9000 Sony SLT-A65
Otherwise known as mju 9000 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2009-05-14 2011-11-15
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 50 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.2-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.00 m 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 225g (0.50 lb) 622g (1.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 717
Other
Battery life - 560 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $300 $700