Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022ed/022ed39c86a4f12fb37f0ee7bf73ec9c47fc264c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-1 front Olympus Stylus SH-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the SH-1 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SH-1 was introduced 2 years after the VG-160 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SH-1 matches up versus the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-1 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-1 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Olympus VG-160
SH-1 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 28 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus SH-1
VG-160 | SH-1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Olympus VG-160
SH-1 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-1 has physical dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-1 against the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98589/98589a77c07cf4eedbfbc290c39ace2ad882c8b0" alt="Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-1 and VG-160 is 88 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ba80/1ba80075965b0df68b9f05143e0dcd8e94606204" alt="Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The picture below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-1 and VG-160.
Plainly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-1 to produce more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher SH-1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b629/6b6291e441911c3c06b727acfadcc0518bb94eb9" alt="Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1fc9/d1fc92a1da560792086c3751aa6cc4e133f8ece4" alt="Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SH-1 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 7cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | 165 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $349 | $90 |