Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic GX9
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45


82 Imaging
60 Features
80 Overall
68
Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic GX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 407g - 124 x 72 x 47mm
- Launched February 2018

Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic GX9: Real-World Comparison for the Savvy Photographer
Choosing the right camera is a matter of balancing your needs, budget, and expectations. Having spent well over 15 years rigorously testing cameras from compact point-and-shoots to professional mirrorless beasts, I’ve learned that understanding the nitty-gritty is crucial. Today, I’m putting two very different cameras head-to-head: the Olympus Stylus SH-1 - a small sensor superzoom compact - and the Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 - a serious advanced Micro Four Thirds mirrorless.
Both have their merits, but they serve wildly different photographic purposes. Let’s unpack what this means to you whether you’re a casual shooter, a travel junkie, or a budding pro. Expect candid observations, hands-on insights, and an honest look at where each camera shines - and where it bends.
How Big? Handling and Ergonomics Face-Off
First impressions do matter, and in camera purchase decisions, size and handling rank near the top. The Olympus SH-1 is a compact superzoom housed in a sleek, pocketable frame, while the Panasonic GX9 sits firmly in the advanced mirrorless camp, with a rangefinder-style body and some heft.
Check out this size and physical comparison:
Olympus SH-1: With dimensions 109x63x42mm and weighing only 271 grams, this little guy easily slips into a jacket pocket or a carry-on bag. Its fixed lens and compact frame make it “grab and shoot” friendly. However, with its small body and compact controls, it’s not as ergonomic for extended handheld use or complex manual operations - and it lacks a viewfinder, which some shooters might find limiting.
Panasonic GX9: At 124x72x47mm and tipping the scales at 407 grams, the GX9 offers a more substantial grip and more clubs for my thumbs - I mean, nicely sculpted dials and buttons. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) and tilting touchscreen improve usability substantially, especially for manual focus aficionados and people who compose in bright sunlight. Its heft also adds stability for longer lens combos.
When you’re out travelling or doing street photography and portability counts, Olympus SH-1 is a clear winner. For deliberate photography, the Panasonic GX9 body feels like a serious tool - easier to hold steady and built for creative control.
Peeking Under the Hood: Sensor Size, Resolution & Image Quality
Sensor technology is the heart of any camera and hugely impacts image quality and creative flexibility.
The Olympus SH-1 sports a 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS sensor (28 mm² area) with 16 MP resolution. This is a typical sensor size for ultraportable superzoom compacts and smartphones alike. On the other hand, the Panasonic GX9 has a much larger Micro Four Thirds sensor measuring 17.3x13mm (~225 mm²), packing 20 MP resolution without an optical low-pass filter (no AA filter). This means the GX9 gathers around 8x more light per exposure, providing better dynamic range, color depth, and noise control, especially as ISO climbs.
What does this mean practically?
- Dynamic Range & Color Depth: The GX9 comfortably delivers more natural gradations, especially in landscapes and scenes with harsh contrast (think sunsets, forests, or urban shadows). SH-1 images tend to clip highlights sooner and lose subtle tonal shifts.
- ISO Performance: The Panasonic is more flexible in low light, maintaining cleaner images up to ISO 3200 and beyond. The Olympus starts showing grain and noise visibly by ISO 800 due to its small sensor size.
- Resolution and Detail: 20 MP doesn’t drastically out-resolve 16 MP in prints but combined with sensor size, it yields crisper, more nuanced textures. The SH-1’s sensor struggles to deliver the same fine detail, especially when images are zoomed or cropped.
In short, the Panasonic GX9's sensor is a game-changer for image quality enthusiasts seeking raw flexibility and a professional edge. The Olympus SH-1 is fine for casual landscapes and social snaps but will frustrate those who crave latitude in editing or print quality above A4.
Design and Control Layout: User Interface Deep Dive
Handling is about more than just size; it’s about how intuitively you can interact with the camera, especially when the creative juices flow or the moment is fleeting.
Olympus SH-1: The SH-1 adopts a minimalist layout reflecting its point-and-shoot pedigree. It lacks dedicated mode dials for shutter or aperture priority, though it does have manual exposure mode - awkwardly buried in menu layers. This places emphasis on convenience over speed. Its touchscreen aids quick focus and settings but it doesn’t support full touch-based manual adjustments.
Panasonic GX9: This one is a playground for button lovers and dial maniacs - you get dedicated shutter speed and aperture rings, a user-customizable mode dial, and a host of customizable function buttons (about 5! If you want). The EVF lets you compose precisely in daylight, and the 3” tilting touchscreen supports touch-to-focus as well as gesture navigation through menus.
For anyone venturing into creative photography, shooting sports or wildlife, or mastering manual exposure, the GX9’s interface beats the SH-1 hands down. The Olympus excels in simplicity but is less efficient when you’re adjusting fast or juggling settings.
What’s on the Back? Screens and Viewfinders Compared
The rear display is often your window to instant feedback, vital for focus confirmation, image review, or shooting in challenging light.
Olympus SH-1: Its fixed 3” LCD with 460k dots is serviceable but not remarkable - colors are a bit washed out under bright sun, and screen visibility is limited at wider viewing angles.
Panasonic GX9: The GX9’s tilting 3” touchscreen boasts a sharp 1,240k-dot resolution, delivering crisp and vibrant previews. Tilt functionality helps low-angle macro shots or awkward perspectives. Plus, its EVF - 2,760k dots, full coverage with 0.7x magnification - offers a bright, crisp live preview with exposure simulation and peaking focusing aids.
In bright outdoor shooting or studio setups, the GX9’s superior screens enable more confident framing and focusing. The SH-1’s simpler display fits the "point and shoot" ethos but lacks finesse for critical composition.
Zoom Lens vs Interchangeable Freedom: Lens Ecosystem Implications
With photography, your lens is often a bigger creative factor than the camera body.
Olympus SH-1: Fixed lens 25-600mm (35mm equivalent) at f/3.0-6.9 aperture range - that’s a spicy 24x optical zoom squeeze. Impressive versatility to cover everything from wide-angle landscapes to distant wildlife or sports. But fixed aperture means shutter and ISO control are your only exposure levers. And as is typical for this zoom range, edge softness and chromatic aberrations creep in at the long end.
Panasonic GX9: Micro Four Thirds mount opens a world of over 100 native lenses - primes, zooms, specialty glass, and third-party lenses from Panasonic, Olympus, Sigma, and Panasonic. You can slap on a fast f/1.4 prime for portraits, versatile zooms for travel, or super sharp macro lenses.
The GX9’s lens ecosystem vastly outperforms the SH-1’s built-in lens in creative potential and optical quality, but at the cost of bulk and expense, obviously.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Catching Fast Moments with Confidence
For wildlife, sports, and street photographers who want fast, accurate focus and continual shooting, autofocus system performance is non-negotiable.
The SH-1 uses contrast-detection AF with face detection; no phase detection. The GX9 pairs contrast and phase detection AF points (49 points), face detection, plus advanced AF tracking modes.
Burst Rate:
- Olympus SH-1: 12 fps continuous shooting (fine for a compact).
- Panasonic GX9: 9 fps mechanical shutter, with silent electronic shutter shooting at up to 40 fps (albeit at reduced resolution).
While the Olympus is quick for a compact - good for capturing children and casual action - the Panasonic’s hybrid2 AF system is more reliable in tracking moving subjects with tricky backgrounds. Its burst mode options work well for sports and wildlife photography.
Specialized Photography Disciplines: Who Excels Where?
Let me break down the strengths and weaknesses of each camera across popular photography genres:
Portraiture
- Olympus SH-1: Fixed zoom lens limits aperture (max f/3.0-6.9) so shallow depth of field bokeh is modest. Face detection helps but not on par with today’s advanced eye or animal eye AF. Color reproduction is decent for casual portraits.
- Panasonic GX9: With fast primes and strong AF tracking, the GX9 produces creamy bokeh, excellent skin tones, and has focus stacking and bracketing for critical shots. Better for serious portrait work.
Landscape
- Olympus SH-1: Handy zoom but limited sensor dynamic range restricts highlight and shadow detail in dramatic scenes. Lack of RAW support constrains editing options.
- Panasonic GX9: Larger sensor, RAW support, excellent dynamic range, and better manual control deliver superior landscapes.
Wildlife and Sports
- Olympus SH-1: Impressive zoom, decent burst, but slower AF tracking plus small sensor mean lower quality at high ISO needed for fast shutter speeds.
- Panasonic GX9: Faster autofocus, bigger sensor for quality, silent shutter for shy wildlife, and lens options make it the better choice.
Street Photography
- Olympus SH-1: Pocketable and discreet, perfect for candid shoots. Quick startup and zoom versatility help.
- Panasonic GX9: Slightly bigger but still compact; EVF aids in framing discreetly. More manual control for street photography purists.
Macro
- Olympus SH-1: 3cm macro focusing is decent for casual shots.
- Panasonic GX9: Supports macro lenses with autofocus and focus stacking.
Night & Astro
- Olympus SH-1: Limited ISO performance and no RAW means noisier images and less post-processing flexibility.
- Panasonic GX9: High ISO capabilities, RAW output, and long exposure controls excel here.
Video
- Olympus SH-1: Full HD 1080p up to 60fps, with basic in-body stabilization and built-in mic port.
- Panasonic GX9: Offers 4K video and 4K photo modes, better image stabilization, but lacks mic or headphone ports.
Travel
- Olympus SH-1: A travel buddy for those prioritizing lightness and zoom reach.
- Panasonic GX9: Ideal for photographers wanting higher image quality and versatility, albeit with heavier gear.
Toughness, Battery, and Connectivity
Build: Neither are weather sealed or ruggedized, so outdoor enthusiasts should exercise caution in adverse conditions.
Battery Life:
- SH-1: Rated for 380 shots, good for travel shooters who don’t click non-stop or carry extra batteries.
- GX9: Around 260 shots, typical for mirrorless but less endurance means spares are advisable.
Connectivity: Both have built-in wireless but lack GPS. The GX9 adds Bluetooth, which is nice for faster pairing with apps.
Pricing and Value Assessment: What Are You Paying For?
- Olympus SH-1 launched at $349 - clearly targeting casual users or those who want a superzoom compact for trips and everyday use.
- Panasonic GX9 priced around $999 - aimed at enthusiasts and amateurs wanting an affordable entrance into interchangeable lens and high image quality.
For the price gap, you get far more flexibility, better image quality, and professional features with the GX9 - but at the expense of size, weight, and a learning curve.
The Numbers Speak: Side-by-Side Scoring and Sample Photos
A picture is worth a thousand words - here’s some real-world sample shots from both cameras showing their capabilities in daylight, low light, and portrait. Take note of detail, dynamic range, and color rendering.
And here’s a performance scorecard combining overall and genre-specific ratings based on my independent testing benchmarks (sensor, AF, video, ergonomics, value):
Final Thoughts, Candid Pros & Cons, and Who Should Buy Which
Olympus SH-1 - Pros
- Extremely portable, light, and pocketable
- Strong 24x zoom for versatile shooting
- Simple, intuitive operation for beginners or those wanting point and shoot
- Good battery life for compact
- Built-in stabilization and mic port for basic video work
Olympus SH-1 - Cons
- Tiny sensor limits image quality and editing latitude
- No RAW shooting, limiting post-processing
- Moderate aperture limits low-light and creative depth of field
- No viewfinder, small low-res screen
- Limited manual control; no phase detection AF
- No weather sealing
Panasonic GX9 - Pros
- Large Micro Four Thirds sensor with excellent image quality
- Interchangeable lenses open creative horizons
- Advanced autofocus system with phase detection and tracking
- EVF with high resolution and full coverage
- Tilting touchscreen and customizable controls for speed and precision
- 4K video and 4K photo feature
- Focus bracketing and stacking for macro and landscapes
- Solid build, ergonomic shape
- Bluetooth enabled
Panasonic GX9 - Cons
- Heavier and larger than compact cameras
- Battery life modest, requires spares for long outings
- No mic/headphone ports (limiting for serious videographers)
- Price significantly higher than SH-1
- No weather sealing
Who Do I Recommend These Cameras For?
If you’re:
-
A casual snapshooter, novice, or travel cheapskate who values pocketability and a massive zoom range without fuss - Go with Olympus SH-1. It’s a reliable, compact superzoom perfect for holidays, family, street snaps, and casual video, without the stress of interchangeable lenses or complex controls.
-
An enthusiast or part-time pro who wants advanced manual control, better image quality, lens choices, and capability to grow creatively - Panasonic GX9 is your pick. It delivers in portraiture, landscapes, wildlife, and events - and with investment in lenses, becomes a versatile lifelong tool.
Wrapping Up
Comparing the Olympus SH-1 and Panasonic GX9 is really comparing apples and oranges. The SH-1 is a pocket-sized superzoom marvel designed for ease and flexibility on the go. The GX9 is a serious creative tool aimed at photographers who want quality, control, and upgrades.
Over my years of field testing, I’ve seen that sensor size and lens versatility often dictate whether photographers find their gear inspiring or frustrating - and here, the GX9 big sensor with MFT lenses clearly outperforms in image quality and control. However, if carrying a DSLR or mirrorless rig feels like overkill for your needs, the Olympus will reliably serve as a fun, lightweight travel companion.
Keep your own shooting style, budget, and patience for complexity top of mind, and you’ll find your match quickly.
Happy shooting, and may your photos always please your eye!
- Your hands-on camera tester and gear advocate
Image Credits: Olympus and Panasonic product images, sample photographs by the author (used with permission)
Olympus SH-1 vs Panasonic GX9 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-03-31 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,760 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | - | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271g (0.60 pounds) | 407g (0.90 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 124 x 72 x 47mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | 260 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 photos over 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $349 | $1,000 |