Olympus SH-1 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus SH-1 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2014
- Successor is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2012
Olympus SH-1 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus SH-1 and Pentax WG-2 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the SH-1 (16MP) and the WG-2 GPS (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-1 was announced 2 years later than the WG-2 GPS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SH-1 scores versus the WG-2 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SH-1 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-1 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-1 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
SH-1 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2014 | February 2012 | Fresher by 27 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus SH-1
WG-2 GPS | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
SH-1 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SH-1 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-1 has outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 GPS has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-1 and Pentax WG-2 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-1 vs the WG-2 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-1 and WG-2 GPS is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-1 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-1 and WG-2 GPS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you will need to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The younger SH-1 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-1 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-1 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 198 gr (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 260 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $349 | $300 |