Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
88 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus SH-1 and Ricoh GR Digital III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SH-1 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the SH-1 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe SH-1 was announced 4 years after the GR Digital III which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the SH-1 grades against the GR Digital III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-1 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-1 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| SH-1 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 57 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus SH-1
| GR Digital III | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Ricoh GR Digital III
| SH-1 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-1 features physical measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-1 and Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-1 compared to the GR Digital III.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-1 and GR Digital III is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-1 and GR Digital III.
Plainly, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SH-1 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus SH-1 will give more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The newer SH-1 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2009-07-27 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 208 grams (0.46 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $349 | $399 |