Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-4
Portability
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
Olympus SH-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus SH-2
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus SH-1 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SH-1 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SH-1 was revealed 2 months later than the WG-4 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SH-1 scores versus the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-1 & Ricoh WG-4. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SH-1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Ricoh WG-4
| SH-1 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus SH-1
| WG-4 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Ricoh WG-4
| SH-1 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | February 2014 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-1 offers exterior measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-1 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SH-1 vs the WG-4.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-1 and WG-4 is 88 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-1 and WG-4.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of images although you should really factor the age of the products into consideration.
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-1
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides face detect focus
no manual focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus SH-1 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography advice
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has focus by touch
lighter than average in class (271 grams)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus SH-1 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography factors
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery (380 shots)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
slow fps (2.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery (240 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus SH-1
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4
better than average battery (380 shots)
lighter than average in class (271 grams)
has focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
environment proof
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery (240 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus SH-1 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
better than average battery (380 per charge)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
manual focus
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment proof
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
low battery (240 CIPA)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-1 Vlogging features
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging features
reasonably wide (25mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
has mic socket
lighter than average in class (271 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
really wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus SH-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | 240 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $349 | $330 |