Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung HZ35W
88 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus SH-1 and Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-1 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-1 was introduced 3 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the SH-1 matches up vs the HZ35W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-1 & Samsung HZ35W. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SH-1 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Samsung HZ35W
| SH-1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 | June 2010 | More modern by 47 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus SH-1
| HZ35W | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Samsung HZ35W
| SH-1 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-1 comes with external dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-1 and Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the SH-1 and the HZ35W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-1 and HZ35W is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specifications. The pic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-1 and HZ35W.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus SH-1 to show extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger SH-1 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also Known as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $349 | $300 |