Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung SL102
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus SH-1 versus Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SH-1 (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe SH-1 was introduced 5 years after the SL102 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SH-1 matches up vs the SL102 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-1 & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-1 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Samsung SL102
| SH-1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 64 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus SH-1
| SL102 | SH-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Samsung SL102
| SH-1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-1 comes with external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-1 versus Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the SH-1 against the SL102.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-1 and SL102 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The picture here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-1 and SL102.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus SH-1 to offer more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The newer SH-1 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $349 | $130 |
