Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung WB800F
88 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus SH-1 versus Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the SH-1 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-1 was introduced 15 months later than the WB800F making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SH-1 matches up versus the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus SH-1 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-1 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Samsung WB800F
| SH-1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 | January 2013 | Fresher by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus SH-1
| WB800F | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Samsung WB800F
| SH-1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | The same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-1 offers external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-1 versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the SH-1 against the WB800F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-1 and WB800F is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-1 and WB800F.
As you can see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same MP so you can expect similar quality of photographs but you really should factor the age of the products into consideration. The fresher SH-1 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $349 | $300 |