Olympus SH-1 vs Sony HX300
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony HX200V
- Renewed by Sony HX400V
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus SH-1 versus Sony HX300, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the SH-1 (16MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-1 was launched 14 months later than the HX300 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the SH-1 grades vs the HX300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SH-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-1 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Sony HX300
SH-1 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2014 | February 2013 | Fresher by 14 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus SH-1
HX300 | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Sony HX300
SH-1 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-1 features outer measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-1 versus Sony HX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the SH-1 vs the HX300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-1 and HX300 is 88 and 63 respectively.
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-1 and HX300.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Sony HX300 to give extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent SH-1 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-03-31 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 623 grams (1.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $349 | $339 |