Olympus SH-1 vs Sony T900
88 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-1 vs Sony T900 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus SH-1 and Sony T900, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the SH-1 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SH-1 was manufactured 5 years after the T900 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the SH-1 scores against the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-1 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus SH-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SH-1 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Sony T900
| SH-1 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 | February 2009 | More modern by 63 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus SH-1
| T900 | SH-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-1 and Sony T900
| SH-1 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-1 offers external measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Olympus SH-1 and Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SH-1 vs the T900.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SH-1 and T900 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-1 and T900.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus SH-1 to give you more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer SH-1 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SH-1 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-03-31 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271g (0.60 lb) | 143g (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $349 | $300 |